Processos Vol VIII Pages 2006 to 2022 – Letter regarding Danilo Chemello and Aurora Pereira Vaz (French) 2007.07.27

SUBJECT: Inquiry into the disappearance of Madeleine Mac Cann

  • Information from French authorities.
    For analysis within the scope of the ongoing investigation and other purposes that are considered appropriate, I have the honor to refer you to Your Excellency*. reports on the activities of Danilo Chemello and Aurora Pereira Vaz, which were sent to me, as a spontaneous transmission of information (art. 6 of the Conv. Aux. Jud. Mútuo entre os
    States of the European Union, 29 May 2000), by Dr. Samuel Vuelta Simon, French Liaison Magistrate in Madrid.
    Please accept, Hon. Colleague, my best regards.

OBUJETO: SPONTANEOUS TRANSMISSION OF INFORMATION
Dear colleague, An Italian Danilo CHEMELLO was arrested on June 28 in the south of Spain on an international arrest warrant and the Spanish police investigated his possible involvement in the disappearance of the little British girl Madeleine Mac Caan (Maddie), to the extent that he and his partner tried to defraud
the parents of the kidnapped minor by extracting a reward from them. Danilo CHEMELLO is also wanted in France under an arrest warrant from the Nice Tribunal de Grande Instance having sentenced him in his absence on February 3, 2008 for participation in a criminal association with a view to preparing a crime punished with at least 5 years in prison. In this French case, CHEMELLO, at the time in pre-trial detention in connection with proceedings against him for having mistreated his children, had undertaken to
have a private detective follow the judge in charge of the case, to blackmail him. During the discussions that I was able to have with the JIRS prosecutor’s office in
Marseille, colleagues have pointed out to me other elements relating to Danilo CHEMELLO which deserve, subject to your appreciation, to be
communicated to the Portuguese public prosecutor’s office which has and is responsible for the kidnapping of the minor
Maddie. I am attaching a copy of a report on CHEMELO and his partner in which, in addition to the mistreatment he was accused of of his daughter Chiara, the
following elements appear about the CHEMELLO/PEREIRA spouses: In 2000 and 2001, they would have negotiated with American interlocutorsegg purchases and surrogacy services.

They allegedly had frozen embryos sent to a Greek doctor.
Uncertainties exist regarding the true biological parentage of minors
Alessandro and Chiara,
There are possibilities of disappearance of children and simulated pregnancies. These elements may constitute, according to French law, Offenses, certain acts of which may have been committed in the following countries: Russia, Belarus,
Great Britain, Greece, United States, Switzerland. During these criminal activities which are linked to the medical environment, CHEMELLO and his partner were able to be in contact with Gerry and Kate Mac Caan, parents of the minor Maddie, who are also both doctors
(cardiologist and general practitioner) As part of the spontaneous exchange of information provided for in the agreement of May 29, 2000, the JIRS prosecutor’s office in Marseille transmits these elements to the authorities
competent in Portugal and remains at their disposal for further information
complete.
Best regards

ELEMENTS FOR APPREHENSION OF THE FILE CHEMELLO | PEREIRA
On October 17, 2005, the MARSEILLE Prosecutor’s Office received from the DRAGUIGNAN Prosecutor’s Office a
copy for study of the case known as “Danilo CHEMELLO and Aurora PEREIRA VAZ LUCARNI”.
Case made up of months of files: 1/ A judicial investigation opened on December 18, 2003 against Danilo CHEMELIO and Aurora PEREIRA VAZ LÚCARINI (Aurora PERETRA) on charges of deprivation of care to the point of compromising one’s health by legitimate ascendancy over a minor aged 15 and subtraction , without legitimate reason, to its legal obligations to the potential of seriously compromising the health, safety,
morality or the education of his minor child by legitimate ascendant. By supplementary indictment of February 2, 2004, the referral to the investigating magistrate was extended to the acts of simulating children (Alcssandro and Chiara). After separation of the proceedings, Aurora PEREIRA and Danilo CHEMELLO were dismissed from the offenses of endangering minors; investigations continuing to determine the conditions of birth
by Alessandro and Chiara (Information still in progress)
2/ A second judicial investigation opened on December 1, 2004 against Danilo
CHEMELLO of counts of invasion of privacy and attempted murder. 3/ a preliminary investigation initiated on December 22, 2003 on the basis of article 74-1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure concerning the disappearance of the child Eduardo. This investigation was
entrusted to the research section of the gendarmerie in MARSEILLE.

PLAN
Preamble:
Biography of the CHEMBLLO/PEREIRA family
He Summary of each of the three files
A/ Summary of the facts of the minor endangerment case and child simulation
B/ Summary of the preliminary investigation concerning a worrying disappearance of a child
C/ summary of the file concerning the acts of invasion of privacy and attempted assassination
II) Search for elements relating to possible infractions in bioethics matters
A/ The documents and elements present in the file
B/ Offense likely to be prosecuted
C/ the countries likely to be affected by the facts

In Summary
Al Summary of the minor endangerment and child simulation case. This affair began on December 11, 2003, the day when Avrora PEREIRA and her daughter Carolina presented themselves to the territorial brigade of Saint-Tropez to denounce violence committed by her companion, Danilo CHEMELLO. The first investigations showed that Danilo CHEMELLO had left the family home to the despair of his partner. During the hearings Carolina expressed the wish not to return to her mother’s home and revealed that Danilo CHEMELLO had left the home ten times because his partner was persecuting him. She denounced having been beaten and strangled by her mother in order to obtain from her the return of Danilo CHEMBLIO because she was the only one who could find the words that would bring him back. Carolina also revealed to investigators that her half-sister, Chiara, then five years old, was being mistreated. Most of the time, she slept and ate on the bathroom floor while her half-brother Alessandro was treated like “a little king”. Carolina claimed that her sister spent her time locked in the garage or in the bathroom, plunged in the dark, with her wrists and ankles tied up. Blle ate her meals and slept on the floor. The elements and testimonies collected demonstrated that everything was organized to hide the existence and fate of this child who had no toys, who had very little relationship with his brother Alessandro and who had not been the subject of any follow-up. medical since 1998. All the testimonies collected from people who approached the couple and the findings made by the psychologist on CHIARA attested that this child had been literally dehumanized by the treatment inflicted by her mother and by the fact that her father did not was never opposed to it. During a search carried out on December 19, 2003, two plastic bags relating to the adoption of a child in Russia were discovered with two respective payments of 20,000 dollars. The translation of the various messages recorded on the laptop’s memory at the end of 2000 and the beginning of 2001 showed that the CHEMELLO/PERBIRA spouses negotiated with an interlocutor located in the United States the purchase of ovals and the services of a “surrogate mother”. », all with costs for sending frozen embryos to a Greek doctor. In January 2001, when they learned that the children purchased were girls, they abandoned their project (D 233 and D271).

Alessandro declared that his mother had spoken to him about two brothers and a sister but, suffering
of a skin disease, he had never been able to meet them.
To this disturbing element were added many others: during the declaration of the birth of CHIARA on May 28, 1998, Mr. CHEMELLO
had specified that he was married to the child’s mother. Contrary to the editorial file, Mr. CHEMBLIO indicated that the child had left the mother after his mother while it was established that Chiara had left on May 28 against release of responsibility and “his mother” on May 30, 1998 – Carolina TANA explained that his mother had told him about several miscarriages, the last having taken place just before the birth of Alessaudro, having never seen his mother pregnant, the latter always carrying a cushion and having seen his mother menstruating during pregnancy by Alessandro. She added that when CHIARA was born, her mother’s reaction had been very violent to the point of not visiting her daughter in the maternity ward, being certain that her child had been exchanged at birth.

  • Doctor Gilles CHARPENTIER, doctor who carried out the birth of CHIARA, remembered that the patient who had given birth to the child was not forty five years old Corame Aurora PERBIRA, He added that deliveries at this age were classified as at risk, the management strategy would have been different. – The genetic expert report concluded that Danilo CHEMELLO was indeed the father of Chiara and Alessandro, however, the analysis of the butts smoked by Aurore PEREIRA established that she was not the mother of either of the two children. During the information, she refused any sampling of biological elements! • The medical file entered contained an error in the spelling of the mother and the date of birth. The discharge was written in English and in a handwriting which did not seem to correspond to that of Aurora PEREIRA – Discovery of a letter addressed to the Spanish consulate in MINSK. According to Danilo CHEMELLO, this letter was part of a process to allow the immigration of a Belarusian woman at the request of one of her friends italica (D135) Aurora PEREIRA and Danilo CHEMBLIO were referred, detained, to the Criminal Court of DRAGUIGNAN of counts of deprivation of care or food compromising the health of a minor under 15 years of age by ascendant or person in authority and evasion of legal obligation compromising the health, safety, morality or education of children. After appeal against a judgment of the DRAGUIGNAN Criminal Court, Aurora PERBIRA and Danilo CHEMBLLO were acquitted of the charges of deprivation of care or food and convicted of the charge of evasion of a legal obligation compromising health, safety ( etc.) children sentenced to 18 months’ imprisonment and kept in detention.

BI Summary of the preliminary investigation concerning the facts of the worrying disappearance of children The preliminary investigation was initiated on December 22, 2003 on the basis of article 74-1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure from a telephone call of December 19 December 2003 of a certain
Carmello NISI who presented himself as a former right-hand man at the time when the family
CHEMELLO lived in JUAN LES PINS. Questioned by a press article which mentioned a family of three children, Carmello NISI declared that a little boy, Eduardo, was born a year after Chiara. He specified that the child’s mother had given birth at the WILSON clinic in ANTIBES and that he was now around three years old. During his successive hearings (exhibits 3 and 15), Carmello NISI confirmed his telephone comments. He explained that he had met the family ten years earlier during the renovation of their villa in JUAN LES PINS. Having become their trusted man, he had seen the household expand first with the birth of Alessandro, then of Chiara and finally of Eduardo. Aurora PEREIRA gave birth to Alessandro in a Swiss Cuviron clinic a year after moving into the villa “Les Roches”. Because she bought baby essentials in triplicate, he remembered thinking that Aurora PEREIRA was expecting triplets. This birth was followed by a long stay abroad, a brief return to France then a new departure for different hotels abroad. He also remembered meeting a person in October 1997 – recommended by the PIZANI travel agency in BEAULIBU – who was going to GREECE to have sperm analyzed. He claimed to have seen the child Eduardo twice. In August 1998 when the family was leaving for Switzerland aboard a Limousine with driver and on September 16, 1998, when they finally left the villa. This day the delivery to Danilo CHEMELLO of a check for 54,475.02 francs in settlement of a work invoice for water damage dating from September 24, 1997. He also remembered that during his trip to ENGLAND in June 1999, he understood that something had happened to Eduardo after seeing Chiara tied up in a camisole supposedly to prevent him from scratching his face. His brother, Grégorio NISI, who himself had worked on the renovation and maintenance of the villas in JUAN LES PINS and CANNES, described them as “crazy and sick” (picco 4) who lived locked up in their villa. According to him, the couple had four children. Like his brother, he believed that Alossandro was born to triplets and his sister Chiara to twins. He had seen Eduardo twice, when he arrived and when the family finally left for Switzerland. He specified that their stay in JUAN LES PINS, although interspersed with multiple trips abroad, had lasted several years.

Alessandro CHEMELLO told investigators that he had a sister and two brothers whose photos he had seen, his mother repeated to him that his brothers, who were allergic, were at a doctor’s office. Carolina TANA had never seen her mother pregnant, she constantly wore a cushion to simulate pregnancy. She remembered her mother’s last miscarriage which had occurred shortly before Alessandro’s birth. When the latter was born, as when Chiara was born, she left for Geneva the same morning and returned at the end of the day.
She explained her brother’s words
C / Summary of the preliminary investigation concerning the facts of the head of the criminal association with a view to preparing the offense of blackmail On September 27, 2004, while Danilo CHEMELLO and his wife were in pre-trial detention in connection with the deprivation case care, a detainee from the DRAGUIGNAN remand center, sent a letter to Ms. Dominique GUIRAUD, investigating magistrate in charge of the case. He explained that a fellow inmate, Danilo CHEMELLO, had charged a detective, Bernard NATANJO, with a mission to shadow the magistrate in order to note all his movements, his private behavior and to compile a file in order to harm him and opt for pressure on her in the context of current information; all for a remuneration of 15,000 euros. It indicated that letters had been drawn up and that she appeared there under the title “notary” but also that the execution of the mission had already begun. In his hearing, the author of the letter clearly mentioned the existence of the plan to kill the judge. Bernard NARANJO was identified and located but he did not appear on the file of the private detective profession. He also appeared to have been involved as an author in various investigations.
An investigation was opened on October 1, 2004 on charges of invasion of privacy and attempted assassination. A search of the home of Bernard NARANJO led to the seizure of various letters and
documents established by Danilo CHEMBLLO as well as shooting equipment and a computer. Understandable, Bernard NARANIO confirmed the existence of the mission but maintained that he had never known that under the name “notary” was hidden Madame GIRAUD, investigating judge at the Draguignan Public Prosecutor’s Office; which was refuted by certain letters found at his home. Having presented a quote of 15,000 euros to Danilo CHEMELLO, he was waiting for the first payments before starting his mission. Danilo CHEMELLO confirmed that he had asked Berard NARANJO to investigate the morality of the investigating magistrate. To do this, he sent a contract in which the details of the mission appeared:

Leave a Reply