From the analysis of the recordings made, containing the interceptions carried out and ordered in the present records of the targets designated by codes 11.769M, 11.770IE, 1L770M,
11.771PIE, 11771PM, 11.772PIE, 11772PM, 118031E, 11803M, 11804M, 11805M, 11826,
11827, 11828, 11829, 11829M, 33030, 33031M and 33031IE in the period between
13 May to 21 May 2007, which I validate, resulted in the following: – regarding card no. 91 746 2308, with code 1L769M, the sessions with the numbers 41, 55, 59, 60 and 64, therefore, under the provisions of article 1889, no. 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the
its transcription and addition to the records; – regarding card no. 91 918 84 41, with code 1L772PM, the sessions with numbers 07 are of interest for the ongoing investigation, therefore, under the provisions of article 188, no. 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, it must be transcribed and
joining the files; – regarding card no. 91 416 85 57, with code 11804M, the sessions with numbers 02 are of interest for the ongoing investigation, therefore, under the provisions of article 1889, no. 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, it must be transcribed and
joining the files; in relation to the remaining targets and the records of the targets just mentioned, whose transcription was not ordered because no sessions of interest for the present investigation were found, accepting the understanding adopted by the European Court of Human Rights and more recently by the Constitutional Court (Judgment of
Constitutional Forum no. 660/2006, of 28.11.2006, published in DR, 2nd series, no. 7, of
¡0.01.2007), I refer its destruction to a future moment, as per opportune.

Make available to the PJ, for transcription purposes, the CDs containing validated sessions, so that only these can be recorded on a new CD (by target and numbered), which must be delivered together with the respective transcriptions in order to be kept in the safe of the
Court – art. 1019, 2 and 3 of the CPP applicable ex vi of art. 188°, 4, of the code in question. During interception and recording, the formalities established in art. 188 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, an observance that, if elements are collected, must be carried out every 10 days, ensuring the
confidentiality of the operation Taking into account the content of the interceptions already carried out and the result of other steps taken in the present investigation, it is concluded that the assumptions that
led to the authorization of telephone interception to the mobile telephone numbers 91 746 23 08, 91 988 19 59 and 91 918 84 41, and to [MEIS no. such as providing the respective IMEI number, trace-back records, cellular location and
detailed billing with breakdown of incoming calls – art. 187, 1 and 190e of the Code.
Proc. Criminal.
D. In view of the above, and despite the deadline granted ending on 29.05.2007, I extend for a further 15 (fifteen) days the authorization to intercept and record conversations or
communications via written messages to and from said mobile phones and IMEI.
Interceptions will be carried out in the precise terms previously ordered.
Make an official statement to the respective operators, also requesting information regarding the detailed billing and cellular location of the numbers indicated below from November 2006 until
this date, which must be provided in digital format: